Jupiter Events (in reverse chronology) (some Saturn events also)

Feb. 8, 2018 update:

Expect a significant event on Saturn between 2020 and 2025, as in a "Wesley Mark"-type event. (hopefully Saturn and the event are clearly viewable when it happens).

If Saturn reacts similarly to what JOTH theory has predicted at Jupiter, and the mark and flash events are a result there, then we should see some sort of similar sequence (marks and flashes) on Saturn between the years of 2020 and 2025 (rough estimate says 7/14/23 +/- one year either way = July '22 to July '24, range, the wide guess range due to Jupiter and Saturn having different variables). 

Note there has been no "mystery mark" reported on Saturn  (although not nearly as many images are available for Saturn compared to Jupiter) as Jupiter had one month after its RTG/RHU/LWRHU insertion; the 5th edition of Carper's book mostly discounts Jupiter's 10-19-03 "mystery mark" as an anomaly unrelated with said man-made inserted devices.  Therefore the LWRHU theory (small pellets) is beginning to give way to the GPHS-RTG theory (large pellets) as the most likely cause of the other anomalous events on Jupiter starting in July 19, 2009, according to JOTH theory of Carper's book. 

The above prediction dates then are for a "Wesley mark"-type event (similar to Jupiter's 7-19-09 event) to occur on Saturn some time in the above-stated range due to RHU's from the GPHS-RTG's (the large plutonium pellets) insertion on 9-15-17 (5.8 yrs. later +/- 1 year).

http://www.popsci.com/timeline-cassini-plunge-friday   Above, related to the Jupiter-Galileo mission of course is the very similar Saturn-Cassini mission which ended today (9-15-17) with a similar plunge to Galileo's plunge in 2003.  More info on this here

--Jupiter's GRS seems to have recovered as of the latest measurement by JUNO:
"Measuring in at 10,159 miles (16,350 kilometers) in width (as of April 3, 2017) Jupiter's Great Red Spot is 1.3 times as wide as Earth."  link

May 26, 2017 !!! - Sorry I didn't post this earlier.  I just found out today (2/23/18) but in May of 2017 there was another supposed "impact" at 51 degrees north lat. and 292 degrees long. (Sys III). 

Once again the follow up images detected no evidence of debris or heat, so once again this looks like ELECTRICAL in nature and generated likely from WITHIN Jupiter.  This makes 5 detected flashes (actual flashes are many more) in 2886 days since the estimated 7/1/09 "Wesley mark"-activating event from within Jupiter (the mark came later on the 19th), averaging 1 detection every 577 days (1 every 1.58 years or 0.633 detections per year).  If the estimate of "actual flashes" still holds at 6 to 7 per year then this means observers are only detecting (verifiable detections) around 9-10% of the actual flashes occurring, which is reasonable to accept.


"Jupiter just got beaned for the sixth time (that we know about)! On the evening of May 26th, between 19:24.6 and 19:26.2 Universal Time, Sauveur Pedranghelu, a French amateur from Corsica, detected an impact flash live on video in Jupiter's north polar region."

'Jupiter watchers are excitedly training telescopes and cameras on the giant planet in hopes of seeing if the meteoroid explosion left any traces similar to the dark spots in similar impacts of the past or possibly a bright spot when photographed through narrowband methane filters.

Early observations haven't turned up a trace . . . yet. On May 28th from the Philippines, planetary imager Christopher Go couldn't detect anything certain at the site, writing on his website: "There is no brightening of the impact region in methane band nor is there any noticeable impact remnant." '

March 17, 2016 - !!! Another Flash Detected by two separate sources: Gerrit Kernbauer from Austria and John McKeon from Ireland    Links below:





This appears to be the most massive flash yet.  The electric arc goes 1000's of km above the "surface" of Jupiter.  No debris or heat signature or incoming object was spotted the following days (just like the other flashes) so indeed, this must be another electric flash and implies that the fusion reaction we theorize is still going on and altering Jupiter.

Location of the flash: 12.4 North Latitude, 297.4 Longitude (sys III) since we are saying this sources from the core.

We only see and verify about 1/10 at most of the flashes that happen (this is our current best estimate), therefore at least 40 flashes or events must have occurred since July 2009 for us to verify only 4 of them -- think about how unlikely it is for 40 objects large enough to create large flashes (explosive flashes in some cases) seen from Earth to hit Jupiter recently. See FLASH TIMING for more in-depth info on this.

October 17, 2012: Update: Jupiter Article  Pysics.org article, "Jupiter, Turmoil from Below, Battering from Above"  Quotes from NASA's Glenn Orton, a senior research scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., speaking at the American Astronomical Society's Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting in Reno, Nev. recently:

"The changes we're seeing in Jupiter are global in scale..."

"Images in the visible-light and infrared parts of the spectrum highlight the massive changes roiling the atmosphere of Jupiter."

"...the clearest and driest regions on the planet and show up as apparent hotspots in the infrared view, because they reveal the radiation emerging from a very deep layer of Jupiter's atmosphere."

"...some regions have never been in the state they're appearing in now."

"At the same time, we've never seen so many things striking Jupiter. Right now, we're trying to figure out why this is all happening."

The linked article above implies unusual heating dynamics may be causing the massive cloud and atmospheric changes seen since July 2009 on Jupiter (i.e. barges, and SEB and NEB white bands appearing and fading).  

The first string of images in the article were taken shortly after the Wesley mark was spotted.  We know this because you can clearly see the Wesley mark in the southern region on the very first image.  So this "study" was conducted likely because of the Wesley mark sighting (someone with this Orton group also is suspicious or knows what is really going on).

In the "Philosopher's Stone..." book infrared radiation was predicted as the most likely radiation to increase first. This is because of the opaque nature of Jupiter, some IR will escape out when other wavelengths cannot:

"As far as the character of such a star, if Jupiter were to fully manifest in a stellar way, its size would relegate it to a tiny red dwarf star...  [these types would] give off small amounts of actual radiation heat from their surfaces because they are so opaque and have a high density relative to temperature.   The radiation that is given off at the surface of the star is mostly in the form of infrared and very little UV is emitted into space."

J. Edward Carper (The Philosopher's Stone for the Transformation of Jupiter... - 4th Edition - now retitled "Jovian Transformation...")

Although the physics.org article does not come out and say "overall increased IR radiation from Jupiter", the cloud changes highlighted in the article imply Jupiter heating dynamics have changed drastically (likely new IR heat emanating from the center of Jupiter) since 2009 enough to cause "turmoil from below".

As far as the multiple "impacts" we have indicated why these are happening also.  All of these anomalies are explained in the book:

"On July 19, 2009 we witnessed a large black mark suddenly appear in the southern realms of Jupiter that held in place and blew out debris east of it.   On June 3, 2010 Jupiter sent out a tremendous two-second electrical voltage discharge imaged by amateur astronomers; on August 20, 2010, another discharge of the same but on the opposite point of the Jupiter globe (antipodal).   On September 10, 2012 a third discharge more massive than the first two was imaged near the equator of Jupiter (Figure 2).   None of the three flashes left even a hint of “impact debris”.


This book will cover the above events in detail as well as several other strange recent Jupiter incidents and discuss the proposed cause of these events: NASA’s and the U.S. Department of Energy’s earlier insertions of fissionable and fissile plutonium in the form of highly protected fuel pellets called Light Weight Radioisotope Heater Units (LWRHU’s), and RHU’s (larger size Radioisotope Heater Units)."


J. Edward Carper (The Philosopher's Stone for the Transformation of Jupiter... - 4th Edition - now retitled "Jovian Transformation...")

NASA's article should more rightly be titled: "Turmoil and Battering from Below", because the evidence shows all of these event are sourcing from inside Jupiter.


Another important note about what has happened to the center of Jupiter: If it indeed has been liquidated as Carper's theory proposes, then L3 data which before might have been reliable, should now start to drift from L3 because the internal rotation of Jupiter's core which L3 was based on has likely changed (slowed down a bit?, like a spinning skater who forces some mass and energy outward)!

This means that we must start considering and developing a 4th longitude system to account for the drift of the original core away from true L3, we would call this "L4", obviously. A change in Jupiter's core rotation SHOULD be able to be verified by careful further radio signal analysis from Jupiter's core, which should be done as soon as possible. However, it took many years to establish L3 so it will not be easy to convince the astronomy community to reanalyze new signals now. (J Edward Carper 10/19/12)

Expect more flash events and other unusual events. These things should increase in frequency and start to become the "norm"... Not sure how the astro-community will pull it off as normal, but they will as long as they can. (J Edward Carper 9/21/12)

 September 10, 2012: ANOTHER FLASH !!! (spotted by George Hall and Dan Peterson) --

"I observed an explosion on Jupiter this morning!" exclaimed Peterson after he witnessed, live, a MASSIVE Jupiter flash; this implies an enormous voltage release if electrical in nature, but said by conventionalists to be an "asteroid or comet impact"; initially reported at +12 North, L3: 257, L2: 219, L1:335 and refined later: 

"The flash location has been refined to Long= 345 deg, Lat = +2 deg in system I." (+2, 264 for sys III) http://cosmicdiary.org/fmarchis/2012/09/11/some-news-from-the-september-2012-jupiter-flash/

Link to flash video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=T2YDJXL7ayA  (9/10/2012, at 11:35:30 UT is the time of the flash). 


Also note: NO DEBRIS (and no incoming object) and NO HEAT SIGNATURE HAS BEEN SPOTTED ONCE AGAIN!  This supports Carper's theory that these are ELECTRICAL DISCHARGES from the center of Jupiter and NOT impacts!  With three blasts as large as we have seen and ABSOLUTELY NO DEBRIS SPOTTED? ..this begins to make the "impact" claims laughable.  Also realize that with every flash we are witnessing there is likely another on the far side of Jupiter that we were not able to see; that means the odds are there have been 9+/- flashes total now.  (this latest flash was the largest of the three we've seen and has been estimated by some to be roughly 6 billion flashes of Earth-lightning all concentrated into one, that's 3,000 billion mega joules!).  As voltage would have drastically decreased coming from the center of Jupiter having to overcome great distance and massive resistance, this means the original voltage was many times greater at the source!

 August 20, 2010: Large Jupiter flash, not as intense as the June flash, antipodal in L3 (core rotation) to June 2010 Jupiter flash, said to be yet another "impact".   No debris or heat signature was spotted afterwards.  Link below.


Odds of this antipode are an incredible 1 in 25,000 to have occurred simply by chance alone!; This is based on the small antipodal difference of both flashes (the amount off in lat. and long. ) converted to a surface area, and then compared to entire surface area of Jupiter.

 June 3, 2010: Intense Jupiter flash, massive if electrical in nature, and antipodal in L3 (core rotation) to later August 2010 Jupiter flash, but said to be an "asteroid or comet impact".  No debris or heat signature was spotted afterwards.  Link below.


 July 19, 2009: Enormous Jupiter scar first spotted by astronomer Anthony Wesley.  The mark seems to spew out dark carbon puffs from the same location for weeks nearly surrounding the planet in a ribbon.  Later when the signature was analyzed the debris was said to have "abundant silica" present, which forced astronomers, against their will, to say that the impactor must have been an asteroid, although that was deemed impossible.

Animation of the first few weeks of the Wesley mark event:


Note how the black soot pours out of one spot.  Here is astronomer, Theo Ramaker's, animation and comment on it.  (Hans Joerg Mettig from Jupos.org in Freiburg Germany helped with this animation also):  "Notice that rather than just spreading out, the original impact site seems to keep pouring out black stuff that then drifts away."
This is what you would expect if this mark is actually a DEEP INTERNAL EVENT and NOT AN IMPACT EVENT! This Mark seems to be SOURCING from the same location throughout.   Theo is trying to alert readers that the mark is not acting like an "impact" in his comments.
http://jabbingjupiter.com/wesley-mark-analysis.php  for more in-depth analysis 

 October 19, 2003:  Jupiter "mystery spot" reported as an anomaly of note by amateur astronomer, Olivier Meeckers of Belgium.  The current trend of thinking by the author is that this was indeed just a ordinary splotch unrelated to the inserted devices.

Note: It does NOT take a huge nuclear fission blast to initiate fusion deep inside Jupiter, just a small but extremely hot one, and that the fuel pellets from GSC can very well do (in the same manner, a conventional Earth hydrogen bomb is initiated).  The huge difference between an Earth hydrogen bomb and the proposed sequence deep inside Jupiter is that Jupiter has NATURAL, EVEN, EXTREME CONTAINMENT:  At the proposed initiation point = 30-40 Mbar of natural and even pressure massively increasing the efficiency of the reaction.  Any ongoing process uses "Jupiter itself" (primarily hydrogen) as the fuel, of course, in the same way the Sun's inner nuclear reactions are said to be hydrogen-based (P-P).

Reference Notes

Textual documentation of RTG's and LWRHU's aboard GAEP:

Look Under:

"NASA Radioisotope Power Systems"

"NASA missions enabled by radioisotope heater units"

"Galileo - 120 RHUs (103 on orbiter, 17 on atmospheric probe)"  LINK

Note that these are the RTG's and LWRHU's referred to in the book, and 15 LWRHU's were noted aboard the probe which is what the NASA diagram shown in Carper's book indicates, so evidently there were 2 additional LWRHU's somewhere in the probe scheme.

Goal-in-Hat Publishing, LLC 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018